I have been observing (ok, a lot of it looks like
complaining) that when I stayed with my two granddaughters in South Dakota in
May and my granddaughter in Denver in June, child care on a regular basis is exhausting.
We keep the two and one-half year-old grandson in Va Beach on a regular basis,
usually once a week. Yep, a lot of work.
The other observation I made, though, is the way bonding
plays into the equation. Talk about a tough job you love! And before the trips,
I wanted to talk to and see the little ones, but I didn’t have that yearning
that was enhanced with bonding.
Preface all this with a comment I have heard many times, but
it was repeated recently and goes something like this: “I don’t see how they do
it. Having and caring for those kids is impossibly difficult.”
When I was first married and had children, I was 24 and far
too young to know or even think about the challenges. We had no money, no
support. It had to be harder on my wife, the mother, than it was on me, but I
was working an average of 2 to 3 jobs just to have enough money to buy food.
Many of you can endorse my statement that it is a huge challenge that is made
even more difficult when you’re poor.
Summarizing the articles: Agreed upon: a birth rate of about 2.12 is necessary to replace the current population. The current US birthrate is in the 1.7 range and declining.
NYT—the American fertility rate is declining, blame
increased use of contraceptives and especially Long-acting contraceptives (LARCS)
and millennials are not having sex as much. They used an excellent phrase for
cell phones as one of the culprits—“get-out-of-human-interaction free devices.”
Then concluded that the biggest drop in fertility was in the western states.
COMMENT: Without some
explanation, what does it matter what state has the most or least fertility?
So, Mississippi is the only state to increase. Aren’t there some other factors
at work rather than your time zone? How about race? How about income?
THE GUARDIAN (US Edition)—pretty simple conclusion: The reason
fertility is declining and so far below replacement in the US is because the US
is a terrible place and an even worse place to have and raise a child. OK. ?? Well,
if that conclusion is true, why is the birth date declining similarly among the
Swedes in Sweden, a paradise according to The Guardian? Back up on that
statement—the birth rate is low for Swedes, but the immigrants and especially
the immigrants have much higher birth rates. For that paper, though, don’t
bother me with those kinds of facts—the US is a horrible place.
Now, wasn’t that helpful?
I’ll give you another scenario that is POWERFUL!! Say that
you are a rational, highly-educated, single, 28-year-old woman with a good job.
You are old enough and have enough experience to know (not just suspect, but
KNOW) that having and raising a child is difficult work, risky and expensive. More
kids? = More work. Hmmmm. “I think I’ll wait until Prince Charming drops
around.” Completely true and completely rational thinking. But it is absent the
love and bonding component. As it should be. You can’t love and bond with a
Prince Charming who seems to love his horse too much or for children who are
yet to be born.
My generation just went ahead and got married and blundered
into parenthood. The apprehension of this generation is warranted, but it is
also going to cause a huge change in the civilization going forward. The people
who are educated and wealthy are going to dwindle and become less of a voting
force, and the uneducated and jobless are going to run out of people to provide
for them…and their larger than average number of children. Whoa, there are some
words that can’t be published—not PC.
Interesting set of decades coming up.
No comments:
Post a Comment